The Red Tree - 1717 Words

The Red Tree is another outstanding book by Australian illustrator and author Shaun Tan. The book published by Hachette Australia in 2001 leads us on one girl’s journey through a dark and confusing path of depression. Although each page contains a few words it is the images that capture the reader’s attention with new objects, images and meanings discovered each time the book is reopened. Shaun Tan has had an impressive illustrative career spanning over fifteen years. He has won various awards as an illustrator on notable books such as ‘The Viewer,’ ‘The Rabbits,’ ‘The Arrival,’ ‘The Lost Thing,’ ‘Tales from Outer Suburbia,’ and ‘The Red Tree (Wikipedia 2011).’ Much of Tan’s inspirations are drawn from the environment around him†¦show more content†¦Students through the process of art appreciation will build connections through the exploration of textures, lines, colour and shape when describing, analysing, interpreting and judging the artworks before them (3 chosen images). They are asked to describe what they see, the artist’s use of colour, lines, shapes and texture. They then move onto analysing; what catches their eye, is the composition balanced and do the paintings look flat or do they have depth. The discussion then progresses onto interpretation where students are able to express what type of emotion they feel when looking at the pictures, perhaps the kind of sounds they might hear if they could step into it, and why they think the artist chose this particular subject to paint and what may have inspired the artist. As a result from this discussion, a class list is made on the board describing the types of design elements and how they can be used to create and emotion artwork. The elements being colour and how it can be used to convey emotions e.g. red for anger, yellow -happiness, orange-warmth, and blue-peace. Also, what kinds of lines there are and ways in which they can be used to create patterns, depth perception, and emotion such as straight, jagged, squiggly, thick, thin repetitive or natural. Shapes are important in giving the artwork structure and purpose and can be geometric, natural, imaginative orShow MoreRelatedOutline Of A Red Black Tree736 Words   |  3 Pages/**Implement Red Black Tree * RedBlackTreeNode Class **/ class RBTNode { RBTNode lChild, rChild; int el; int colour; public RBTNode(int element) { this( element, null, null ); } public RBTNode(int element, RBTNode l, RBTNode r) { lChild = l; rChild = r; el = element; colour = 1; } } /** Class RBTree **/ class RBTree { private RBTNode actual; private RBTNode parent; privateRead MoreJourney - Life of Pi, Journey to the Interior, the Red Tree Essay1482 Words   |  6 Pagesindividuals to extend themselves physically, mentally or emotionally as they face challenges. This understanding of mine has been shaped by the novel Life of Pi, written by Yann Martel, ‘Journey to the Interior’, a poem by Margaret Atwood and The Red Tree, a picture book by Shaun Tan. Yann Martel, Margaret Atwood and Shaun Tan use various techniques such as extended metaphors, symbolism, imagery and figurative language to show how journeys lead to self discovery and they are the only way one willRead MoreSymbols And Themes Of The Red Badge Of Courage By Stephen Crane872 Words   |  4 Pages Symbols Help Understand The Theme Symbols and themes play a major role in understanding novels. The symbols and themes can help with getting a better understanding of the novel. A novel that has many symbols is a novel called The Red Badge Of Courage. The author of the novel is Stephen Crane and the genre is historical fiction. In the novel the main character is Henry Fleming. Henry is also known as The Youth. Henry joins the Union in the Civil War. Henry joined the army to have glory. When HenryRead MoreThe Red Badge Of Courage By Stephen Crane917 Words   |  4 PagesGrowing Up From Boys to Men Symbols and themes play a major role in novels. The symbols and themes can help with getting a better understanding in novels. One novel that has many symbols is The Red Badge Of Courage. The author of this novel is Stephen Crane and the genre is historical fiction. In the novel the main character is Henry Fleming. Henry is also known as The Youth. Henry joins the Union in the Civil War. Henry joined the army to have glory. When Henry first gets on the battle field heRead MoreEssay about Neglect Poem Analysis895 Words   |  4 Pagesexplains the feelings of neglect by using imagery, metaphor, and connotation. This poem talks about a path of neglect that a man followed that led to the destruction of his red apple tree. The narrator put too much of his time and attention on his other marvels to not put it into the apple tree as well. Therefore his red apple tree, though thought to be inevitable, died and filled the narrator with regret. A regret that appears to haunt the author, and fills him with sorrow. One of the literacy devicesRead MoreSimilarities Between A Separate Peace And The Red Badge Of Courage1020 Words   |  5 Pageseverything in the world has the easiest answer or the clearest meaning. The average citizen may not take the time to look for symbols in the real world. Those same citizens also may not notice that an object could have a hidden meaning. In the novels The Red Badge of Courage, by Stephen Crane, and A Separate Peace, by John Knowles, both contain symbols that help represent the novels overall theme. Crane’s novel is about a young boy named Henry, who fights in the Civil War. He goes through many internalRead MoreThe African Savanna1201 Words   |  5 Pages Task 3) Acacia Tree and Red Oat grass Two primary producers of the Savanna are the Acacia tree and Red oat grass. Elephants feed off of both the Red oat grass and the Acacia tree. These two are very important for the elephant because elephants are herbivores and without the leaves and grasses they would starve. The elephant doesn’t look for shelter under a rock or in a cave so the grass is nice for them if they rest there or if they decide to rest under the Acacia tree they can get food andRead MoreAnalysis Of Gris Grimly s Frankenstein And My Related Text993 Words   |  4 Pages‘The Red Tree’, identity is never illustrated as static. But what is identity? Identity is the way that someone sees themselves, or the way that someone perceives others. It is an idea that, in the core text and related text, does not stay the same. Changing identity is a key element in both the graphic novel and picture book, as the characters develop over time and they discover their true selves. In Frankenstein (published in 2013, about a creator of life regretting his decisions) and The Red TreeRead MoreCharacteristics And Characteristics Of The Species1103 Words   |  5 Pagesa. List its common name, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species Common name is Red Tailed Catfish: Kingdom- Animalia, Phylum- Chordata, Class- Actinopterygii, Order- Siluriformes, Family-Pimelodidae, Genus: Phractocephalus, and Species: hemioliopterus. b. Which pre-mating isolating mechanisms does this species use? Ecological isolation. Individuals mate in their preferred habitat, and therefore do not meet individuals of other species with different ecological preferencesRead MoreBelonging Essay - 2 Related Texts1078 Words   |  5 PagesLurhmann * The Red Tree by Shaun Tan * Who you are by Jessie J You will almost always find where you belong if you search for it. So ultimately a sense of belonging comes down to perception. This starts from places and/ or relationships, which potentially alter your understanding or you and the world around you, so you can accept the person you are and your individual identity by creating this sense of belonging. In strictly ballroom by Baz Lurhmann, The Red Tree by Shaun Tan and who

History And Accomplishments Of A Young Age Essay - 1332 Words

Race is something that people identify with and to some, it is an important part of themselves that helps build a strong attachment to their identity. However, others also use race as a form of differentiating and even as a form of judgment which in turn may result in racism. Altogether there is so much history to every race which is why some feel so passionate and why many connect so strongly with their race. Because of the history and important events and accomplishments that each individual race has gone through, it is important to understand everyone’s racial background to be more accepting of them. At a young age, many of us are taught to treat everyone equally, no matter how different someone may be. In many societies children are taught that being different is okay and that your differences make you who you are, therefore it is important to embrace those differences rather than be embarrassed of them. This is something that applies to me personally because growing up, schools always tried to tell me and my classmates that everyone should be treated equally and fairly. But even though we were all taught to treat everyone equally, some of those same classmates grew up and either became completely unaccepting of differences or they chose to identify others based on their differences. As a child racism was not something that ever crossed my mind, but now that I am older and now that I have learned about all the stereotypes associated with certain races, I find myselfShow MoreRelatedCatherine The Great Of Russia1560 Words   |  7 Pageson leadership). In history there have been many good examples of good and powerful leaders. A person who exemplifies good leadership; protects one’s nation, is a strong speaker and communicator, is confident, and can organize a well developed government system. Catherine the second, was a Russian ruler. She was ultimately one of the most powerfulest rulers. Many believe that Catherine ruled during a period, in which was considered by many, a golden age for Russia. A golden age is when a civilizationRead MoreA Brief Note On The Civil Rights Movement1269 Words   |  6 Pagesfight segregation, get African Americans in the South involved with the voting process, and be a starting point and a model for other social movements later in our country’s history. The most noteworthy parts of this movement are its successes when faced with systemic marginalization and violence. The first accomplishment of the civil rights movement involved attempting and sometimes succeeding in desegregating buses, schools, and lunch counters. Anne Moody was involved in the first Woolworth’sRead MoreGender Discrimination And Its Effects On Children s Behavior And Personality1508 Words   |  7 Pagessexism in classes through textbooks that do not give historical female figures enough credit for their accomplishments, dress codes that punish girls for their body’s at the risk of the male education, and gender stereotypes placed in schools that have a strong influence on children s behavior and personality. Some may argue against this claim by arguing that women are not given credibility in history books because of their treatment in the past, dress codes are placed to stop distracting boys, or thatRead MoreEssay Abraham Lincoln1426 Words   |  6 Pagesexperiences in its history, the Civil War. He was a very unique president, being the first president to ha ve a beard, being the tallest president standing at 6’4 and also being the first to be assassinated. Abe Lincoln accomplished many things in the 4 year term he had served before being assassinated. With his intelligence and hard work, he made a difference in the United States. For example he released the Emancipation Proclamation which was one of his greatest accomplishments. He passed theRead More Julius Caesar Essay1083 Words   |  5 Pagesand his many accomplishments. Gaius Julius Caesar was born on July 13th, 100 B.C. to a poor, Patrician family in Rome (â€Å"Julius Caesar†; Gruen 12). For most of his young life, Caesar lived in an apartment type house in one of the poorest districts in Rome. He was a strong student and studied such subjects as oratory, philosophy, and even martial arts. Coming from a family that is believed to have a long ancestry of Roman royalty, Caesar quickly found success in Rome at a young age. Caesar marriedRead MoreBrief Biography And Accomplishments Of Oprah Winfrey1077 Words   |  5 PagesBrief Biography and Accomplishments Oprah Winfrey is an icon and role model to men and women all over the world. Many would find it difficult to pinpoint her greatest accomplishment as Oprah has affected the lives of so many in catastrophic ways. However, Oprah wasn’t someone who was simply brought up on sums of money, she created her own luck and surpassed traumatic obstacles that continued to sculpt her into the woman she is today. For Winfrey it all began when she was born in 1954 in KosciuskoRead MoreAnalysis Of The Virgin Warrior : The Life And Death Of Joan Of Arc1441 Words   |  6 Pagestaken away from the incredible woman that held so many triumphs. Instead of giving her readers a list of Joan’s accomplishments, Taylor enthralls the reader by detailing every step of Joan’s life, start to finish, so that one can really understand the life of the warrior. In this work, Taylor is trying to prove how fearless she was at a young age and the extraordinary accomplishments she made because of this attribute. As well, Taylor shows the importance of the fact the Joan was female, which wasRead MoreEssay A Brief Biography of Alexander the Great615 Words   |  3 Pagesking Darius III. He was meant to be the leader of an army that his father had made because as he was growing up he was raised as a commander. At the age of 20, Alexander was already the king of Macedonia. Six years later he conquered Persia. As a young kid Alexander the Great was formed to be a hero and as he grew up and completed his accomplishments he was a hero’s role model, even today he still is. Alexander the Great was a king of Macedonia who conquered an empire that went across a whole countryRead MoreThomas Edison And The Western Society And Mankind1325 Words   |  6 PagesWhen looking back at the people in history the one name that always seems to stand out is Thomas Alva Edison. In this essay I will talk about Thomas Edison and his great contributions to the Western Society and mankind. Thomas Alva Edison was born February 11, 1847 in Milan, Ohio, son to Samuel Ogden Edison, Jr and Nancy Matthews Elliott (Frost). Edison’s mother taught him the three R’s because he only had three months of formal education. Eventually, Edison began to favor in independent self-instructionRead MoreEssay about Ancient Athens1399 Words   |  6 Pageshad numerous accomplishments of its own. Athens â€Å"prosperity †¦ was due in large part to its stable and effective government† (SOURCE 1). When analyzing the history of ancient Athens, is easy to see how the acc omplishments of a democracy, Greek philosophy, and Greek literature all shape Athens. Athens is the home of democracy. It is the first known example of where people began to govern themselves. The democracy of Athens slowly developed around 500 BC, during the Classical Age. In early times

Health Is the Wealth Free Essays

Life is not merely to be alive but to be healthy and wealthy. Virgil says that † The greatest wealth is health† A spanish proverb says that † A man who is too busy to take care of his health is like a mechanic too busy to take care of his tools†. Two things which is always on our mind is Health and Wealth. We will write a custom essay sample on Health Is the Wealth or any similar topic only for you Order Now They are of utmost importance to all of us. Health and Wealth decide the quality of life we lead. If we want to lead a happy life, wealth and health are both important. Wealth is the ability of fully experiencing life. It is true that wealth will not make a person good, but there is nobody who wants to be poor, just for being good. And as Benjamin Franklin says â€Å"Wealth is not his, that has it, but his that enjoys it†. However, there is a tendency of large number of people to run after wealth. They work to gather more and more wealth. Inthe process they ignore their health. They do not take care in eating food at the right time. In the process of gathering more wealth, they also undergo a lot of stress. So many people spend their health in gaining wealth and then spend their wealth to regain their health. Money can buy a tonic but not health, we have to do a number of things to maintain our health . Now because of lack of exercises and proper food and stress the wealth may increase but health begins to suffer. It has been proved that overwork without care for health leads to a number of diseases. Disease like stomach ulcer, obesity are due to bad eating habits. Lack of exercises and stress leads to high cholesterol, Blood pressure and heart problems. So it is better to take care of your health. If we have health, we probably will be happy and if we have both health and happiness we have all the wealth we need. Health and intellect are two blessings of life. Happiness lies first of all in health. Mahatma gandhi says that it is health that is the real wealth and not pieces of gold and silver. Taking care of one’s health should be a continuous process. We should follow a routine of exercises and proper food. It is said that exercise if persued continuously help us to gain strength. We should also follow a diet that is beneficial for our health. Going on diet does not mean limiting your food. We should aim at improving the quality of our food intake. Buddha says that the secret of health for both mind and body is not to mourn the past but to live in the present moment wisely and earnestly. An Arabian proverb says that he who has health has hope and he who has hope has everything. To get rich never risk your health. For it is the truth that † HEALTH is the WEALTH of all WEALTH† How to cite Health Is the Wealth, Essay examples

Gay Marriage Persuasive Speech free essay sample

It discriminates against us, when we are only being ourselves. People say we are the unnatural ones, when in reality; they are the ones being unnatural, as the concept of discrimination is human-made and therefore not natural. Many religions are discriminating against us, and they are one reason why the law has not yet been changed. I am here to argue my case about why gay marriage should be legalised, so that one day I can marry the one I love. As Australians, we believe in equality don’t we? Equal rights for all, men, women, all races etc. Yet, there is still inequality between heterosexuals and homosexuals. It’s legal for heterosexuals to marry who they like, but not for homosexuals. In 2010, the Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young introduced a Marriage Equality Bill. In February of the same year the Senate rejected it. No matter how many Bills have been introduced; they have so far been rejected. This is ridiculous, I cannot understand why a country that believes in equality is restricting gay marriage! America is already far ahead of us, with many states having legalised gay marriage. Even South Africa, where discrimination runs rampant, has legalised it. 1. % of Australia’s adult population are homosexuals. At least, those are the ones we know about; as many feel the need to hide their sexuality because they feel discriminated against. We’re Australians right? We have made discrimination illegal, created equal rights for everyone and all these wonderful things. But we don’t have equal rights for homosexuals; no we’re not allowed to marry the ones we love. People who are fighting against gay marriage are hypocrites. They preach equality and anti-discrimination, but at the same time they discriminate against homosexuals. We say we’re Australian and that we believe in equal rights and are against discrimination, yet every time we fight against gay marriage we are being discriminatory. The majority of common society supports it, just ask anyone in the community, they’ll tell you to legalise it already and move on to more important issues. So if it’s un-Australian, let alone illegal, to discriminate, why is it still happening? Okay I understand some people are super-religious and are against gay marriage because it’s against their religion, but it’s not like we’re asking them to marry someone of the same sex. They claim that it’s a sin in the eyes of God, and that it’s their job to â€Å"stop it†, but God wants us to love one another equally. They argue that it says in the bible that homosexuality is sinful, however in the Age article The Straight and Narrow, the writer, Elizabeth Skinner says â€Å"If Adam marrying Eve in the Bible has anything at all to do with marriage only being possible between a man and a woman†¦ then I pray to God that nobody asks how Cain and Abel (Adam and Eve’s sons) had daughters, because I’m not sure what would be legal then. † God doesn’t judge which gender you love, he doesn’t judge at all. Promiscuity and Abuse, okay I can understand how they are sinful, but homosexuality isn’t necessarily either of those things. The Bible was written in the days when homosexuality wasn’t as well known or accepted and yet many still try to apply it to the 21st century. It’s not meant to be taken literally and applied to every situation in life, many of the stories written were about that particular time period, and don’t always apply to the present day. As society changes, the Church often lags behind, especially when it comes to change. In order to rule out discrimination altogether, the Church needs to catch up to the rest of society. Speaking of a different time, the legal meaning of marriage in Australia is old and out-dated. It was made in the Marriage Act 1961 and states that marriage is â€Å"the union of a man and woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life. † Society has changed dramatically since the ‘60s. Women are less oppressed, and all races are considered equal. Back in the ‘60s people didn’t agree or understand homosexuality, and whatever they didn’t understand scared them. In the 21st century, we believe change is often good and we don’t shy away from what we don’t understand, instead we investigate to try and understand it. We have anti-discrimination laws, which protect sex, race etc. but it doesn’t extend to sexuality. Gay marriage should be legalised, ask anyone on the street, they’ll ask why it hasn’t been done already. Society changes, people change, now all we need is the law to change. So we discriminate against homosexuals, with many people saying it’s â€Å"natural† or â€Å"normal†, however discrimination doesn’t exist in the wild. We tend to think we’re better than animals right? We can talk, make buildings etc. , but animals don’t discriminate. In fact, some animals can be both female and male and even change their sex. For example, schools of clownfish have a hierarchy, with a female fish at the top. If the female fish dies, the most dominant male changes sex to take over the school. The concept of discrimination is man-made. Animals don’t care about homosexuality or the way they look. Another example is Tarzan; yes the good old Disney Tarzan. He was raised by Gorillas in the jungle, they took him in and treated him as one of their own, raised him in their ways. They didn’t say â€Å"you can’t join us because you’re different to us† they accepted him. People tend to discriminate to simply boost their enormous egos or because they’re terrified of difference. Hence, by discriminating against homosexuals and banning them from marrying the one they love, we’re the unnatural ones. Another issue people have with gay marriage is that of starting a family. Many say that Children need one parent of each sex to thrive, not two of one sex. Yet the head of Cambridges Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Michael Lamb testified at a federal trial in San Francisco in 2010 that research has found that the children of same-sex parents are just as likely to be well-adjusted as those of heterosexual parents. He said that childhood adjustment is determined simply by the relationships parents have with their children and each other. Research also suggests that gay and lesbian parents are actually a great resource for kids in need of adoption. According to a report by the Williams Institute and the Urban Institute (in the USA) made in 2007, 65,000 kids were living with their gay adoptive parents between 2000 and 2002, with another 14,000 in foster homes directed by homosexuals. In an October 2011 report by Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute (also in the USA) it was also found that of lesbian and gay adoptions at more than 300 agencies, 10 per cent of the kids placed were older than 6, which is typically a very hard age to adopt out, and about 25 per cent were older than 3. 60 per cent adopted across all races and more than half of the kids adopted by gays and lesbians had special needs. Homosexuals are just as good at caring for children as heterosexual couples, their children grow up to be just as happy and successful as those raised by heterosexuals. They’re willing to adopt those who so many don’t care about, to help those in need. I would love to have children one day, whether it be by adoption or by a sperm donor. I don’t care what race they are or if they have special needs, I would love and cherish them no matter what. If I want to marry the one love and start a family, who are they to stop me? Honestly it’s not like I’m asking you to do anything outrageous, I’m not asking everyone to turn homosexual or anything. Legalizing gay marriage is a reasonable request, especially since we believe in equality. Discrimination is against the law and completely unnatural. Many religions consider it a â€Å"sin† but they’re taking the bible far too literally and taking it out of context. The Law is also old and out-dated, created in a different era of society than the one we live in today, it is meant to keep up with the changing values of society after all. We want children too you know, and we’re just as capable as heterosexual couples, and in some cases even more so. Anyone can see why same-sex marriage should be legalized, so why hasn’t it been?

Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel, and The House of Bernarda Alba, by Federico Garcia Lorca Essay Example

Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel, and The House of Bernarda Alba, by Federico Garcia Lorca Paper Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel, is set in early 20th century Mexico, while The House of Bernarda Alba, by Federico Garcia Lorca, is set in 1930s Spain. Both works delineate the roles of women, as well as the barriers created because of their social and familial situations, which define their experiences. Mama Elena and Bernarda Alba are the symbolic matriarchs, and Rosaura and Angustias symbolize the zealous followers of the conservative family traditions, and Maria Josefa and Morning Light are the knowing elderly. However, in spite of their differences, all of the women experience some form of alienation: psychological, physical, or alienation from the wider community. In the works, figurative barriers created by keys, doors and locks underscore the important element of alienation, which is produced partially by the womens actual or intended perpetuation of conservative family traditions. Consequently, in both texts alienation is self-perpetuating, and finds its source within the family as much as outside it. Maria Josefa in The House of Bernarda Alba and the Morning Light in Like Water for Chocolate are symbols of wisdom. The attempted psychological alienation of Maria Josefa and Morning Light is amplified by the recurring motif of literal and figurative keys, locks, or walls although, ironically, none proves totally effective. In the opening scene of The House of Bernarda Alba, Poncia ensures that Maria Josefa is locked up tight with the crossbar up too, for Shes got the fingers of a lock-picker (Pg. 158). Maria Josefas incarceration prefigures what will happen to the young women in Bernardas house. She also mirrors the genuine feelings of the daughters. We will write a custom essay sample on Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel, and The House of Bernarda Alba, by Federico Garcia Lorca specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel, and The House of Bernarda Alba, by Federico Garcia Lorca specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel, and The House of Bernarda Alba, by Federico Garcia Lorca specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This is conveyed when Maria Josefa sardonically describes the daughters as single women, longing for marriage, turning their hearts into dust (Pg. 175). She proclaims the truth to the daughters that not a one of you is going to marry-not a one (Pg. 175), thus articulates the alienation from normal social relations that they will all suffer. The indirect allusion to doors and walls underscores the imprisonment, confinement and censorship in the house. Such barriers are however, somewhat permeable, as Maria Josefa is still able to communicate her thoughts both cryptically and offensively. In a less tangible sense, the allusion to doors and walls emphasizes the emotional alienation between characters in the house, for their feelings or thoughts are not able to be voiced nor shared. Maria Josefa, with her lock picker fingers, does escape but not for long. Her attempts signify how repressed emotions challenge door and walls. Josefas failure relates to the climax, as well as portends the tragedy of Adelas suicide in Act ?. In Act ? , Adela thinks Pepe, her only means of escape, is demolished. As a result, she commits the ultimate act of self-alienation- suicide, for without Pepe she can no longer achieve her dreams and desires. Antagonists in Like Water for Chocolate also alienate Morning Lights wisdom by figurative and literal barriers. Morning Lights Indian blood prohibits her from enjoying equality in Johns Yankee family. As a result, she and her wisdom are confined in this room at the back of the house which Johns grandfather has built (pg. 100). The walls of this room at the back of the house (pg. 100) reinforce the idea of emotional alienation of Morning Light from the others. These walls are an allusion to social barriers, for Morning Light is alienated because of stereotypical perceptions that Indians are subservient to Yankees. Ironically, the barriers fail to sequester the wisdom of Morning Light. She heals her father-in-law with her magic healing power. Her eccentric way of singing strange melodies, applying curing herbs, and her wreathing in the smoke of copal and incense she burned (pg. 102) finally receives appreciation; and the wisdom of a native Indian previously overlooked due to prejudice, is recognized for the first time. It is also interesting that other momentous events in Like Water For Chocolate tend to take place in rooms and compartments separated from the main body of the house, e. g. the shower, the kitchen, the room where Tita and Pedro consummate their love and passion. Apart from walls, doors are another example of figurative barriers that evoke emotional alienation of characters in the houses, in addition to imposing physical alienation on the characters. In Like Water For Chocolate, a door causes the dark room to be disembodied from the main house. The room, where Tita and Pedro consummate their love, is dark. This suggests their love is clandestine. It also suggests their love is likely to be suppressed by figurative barriers imposed by the wider community. As Pedro slipped silently into the room behind her and shut the door (pg. 144), he attains the private space required for Tita and his delight. The closing of the door completes the sense of enclosure, effectively alienating the passion of the protagonists from outsiders. In this instance, the alienation transforms into a positive and desirable one. Yet, if the protagonists are caught they will become social outcasts and suffer a different kind of self-imposed alienation, and Pedro has not got the courage to risk it. In direct contrast, the effect of the doors as social and psychological barriers is suggested when Rosaura is confined in her room. She is alienated from the truth and passion of Tita and Pedros affair, for she does not have the potential to light her own box of matches. She experiences things from a distance; she sees the ghostly light from the other room, she is in her bedroom, trying to put her daughter to sleep (pg. 44). Sadly, the bedroom is a lonely place for her, and she is not particularly a good mother. In House of Bernarda Alba, the doors and walls literally block people from witnessing Adela and Pepes illicit love affair. Ironically, these barriers do not prevent the antagonists from figuratively, perceiving the truth, just as doors cannot halt the passion from penetrating a house that is supposedly decent. The domination of Pepe over Adela is so profound that there is no actual resistance. Adela confirms Pepes control over her as she proclaims that no one but Pepe commands me! (pg. 209). Unfortunately Bernardas persists on perpetuating the family tradition, so that Adelas love for Pepe cannot continue. Adelas suicide is the ultimate act of self-alienation. Lorca and Esquivel have figurative barriers like keys and locks to underscore the alienation of characters from the wider community. The stallion in the House of Bernarda Alba is an allusion to the innate desires of the daughters, which are particularly expressed by Adela. The animal yearns to be untethered, but is unfortunatel y locked up by Bernarda, the key holder. Like the daughters, the stallion strives to escape the confined space that is in this case, the corral, in order to attain freedom. The stallions drive is conveyed as he kicks against the wall of the house (pg. 197). The sound is so pervasive and disturbing that Prudencia declares she quivered in her chest (pg. 197). Angustias engagement ring is a figurative barrier as well as key to understanding some of the plays emotions and meanings. Engagement rings are traditionally symbols of commitment, and represent the covenant of love. The passion within Angustias waits to be unlocked, and the love of Pepe, symbolized by the ring, is the key to it. But traditionally a ring signified tears(pg. 198). This foreshadows Angustias misery and distance from the happiness of a marriage, imposed by this figurative barrier. Figurative keys and locks inform Like Water for Chocolate. Titas ardent emotions, like matches, are held within a figurative matchbox. Pedros making love to her acts as the key, which unlocks and releases her passion. The unlocking of emotions is so potent that it creates a brightness that shines far beyond our normal vision. (pg. 19). A splendid tunnel then appears that shows us the way that we forgot when we were born and calls us to recover our lost divine origin. (pg. 220). The long-desired love between Tita and Pedro is finally consummated, as their ultimate act of self-alienation by death allows them to break off all barriers and constraints. Esquivel and Lorca have figurative barriers such as keys, doors and locks to highlight the psychological, physical alienation, as well as the alienation of the characters. Under conservative family traditions, desires and dreams of protagonists like Adela and Tita are difficult to attain. The actual or intended perpetuation of traditions by matriarchs like Bernarda Alba and Mama Elena exacerbates the suppression. The protagonists, Adela and Tita choose death as the ultimate act of self-alienation. However, the consequences of their deaths are different. Since the situation for Adela has become too much to bear, she retreats to self-destruction. Her search for fulfillment is therefore an ugly failure. In contrast, with death, Tita and Pedro are able to defy all constraints and consummate their love. As a result, their search for fulfillment is a success- they do open locks and penetrate barriers.

Totalitarionism essays

Totalitarionism essays Over the years there have been many leaders. Three of the most known are Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, and Adolf Hitler. These three were dictators and had a totalitarian government. This essay will discuss their rise to power, public sentiment, and accomplishments. Also it will discuss their crimes and what kind of legacy they left. The three men came to power in almost the same way. Mussolini started a Fascist party and took power. Stalin was part of a Communist committee that ran the country after Lenin died. He used his friends in the committee to get him to power. After he became dictator he had all the people who got him to power killed. Hitler started the Nazi party, which is a Fascist group. With his influence he was voted to power. He too had the people who voted him to power killed. That was known as the Night of Long Knives. The public felt the same for Stalin and Hitler but Mussolini was different. Mussolini was a great public speaker. Whenever he spoke the crowds would cheer. In the beginning Mussolini was liked by the people but in the end the public ended up killing him and hanging him. The people loved Stalin. His people considered him a great man. They wept for him when he died of an aneurysm. The public followed Hitlers ideas and praised him. In the end he killed himself. Each of these leaders made different accomplishments for their country. Mussolini gave the people what they wanted to hear. He did not do a lot of good though. Stalin nationalized the industry and made it spread throughout the world. He ended the civil war. Hitler did a very good thing for his country. He got his country out of the great depression. This was a great accomplishment. He also strengthened the army. As with their accomplishments these leaders had committed many crimes. Mussolini had people killed and censored all of the news so it would not incrimina ...

Probability Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Probability - Term Paper Example Statistics use assumption on population distribution to estimate population values based on sample values (Kemp & Kemp 257-66). Probability distributions functions or simply distribution functions are used (Soong 39-41). The distribution function associates a variable value with a probability (Soong 39). This can take the form Fx(x) =P(Xx) where the lowercase x refers to a specific value of a variable. Probability distribution functions have shapes represented by the mathematical equations. The areas under the curves or distribution functions are associated with probabilities. In business statistics, some of the distribution functions that are often used are the Z-statistics, t-statistics, chi-square distribution, and the F-statistics (Kemp & Kemp 47-297). There is also an option to use what statisticians call as the non-parametric statistics (Kemp & Kemp 298-315). The choice of what distribution functions to use are determined by convention or typical practice and theory. For example, in estimating the population mean, it is assumed that the sample mean converge to the population mean through repetition of sampling procedures or if the population is large. Thus, in estimating the mean, statistics usually makes the assumption based on a normal distribution. Although several distribution functions are used in statistics, in this work we focus our sights on three: the z-statistics, the t-statistics, and the chi-square statistics. Figure 1 captures a standard normal distribution function. The standard normal distribution associates a value of a variable with probability. For example, the probability that the value of the variable is between a very low number and high number can be represented by 100%. In the language of statistics, this take s the form P (-< x < +) = 1 or 100%. In other words, this means that in a

Physics of Formula One Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 words - 1

Physics of Formula One - Essay Example Enzo Ferrari the legend behind the name Ferrari had a passion for car racing which motivated him to come out with the brand name which is today a household name in the field of F1 races. It was in 1945 that the work started on designing and building the very first Ferrari, a project which was being prepared around 12-cylinder2 – a first in the history which went on to provide a direction to the car in general and car racing in particular. Ferrari was the first car to use 1.5 litre unit in a V12 configuration. Since then the company has not looked back. Ferrari, the car was the brain child of its founder Enzo Ferrari. The journey begins with the foundation of Scuderia, sort of a club, on 16th November 1929, exclusively for participating in motor-racing competitions. Enzo Ferrari an integral part of Alpha Romeo for many decades, parted ways in 1929. When Ferrari left the club, he was not allowed to have his name on any of the cars or clubs for the next four years. But his resolve and patience saw him through in his ventures and he started with an 8-cylinder, 1500 cc sports spider, named as 815. It was only in 1946 that the name Ferrari comes into being for cars. The company has not looked back since then. Thereafter came its association with Michael Schumacher in 1996, which further helped in establishing the brand equity called ‘Ferrari’. The F1 racing is now an integral part of Ferrari. In fact F1 racing has now become a big industry in itself. Such developments have started driving other car manufacturers as well int o the race and serious manufacturers like BMW have also started experimenting with the sporty driving. Though it may sound boring to people watching the racing on the tracks, its television clippings have started commanding huge premium. This potential was foreseen by Mr. Ecclestone of ‘Formula One Administration’, who produces the electronic feed being watched by over 40 billion viewers (The

Affluent Society Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Affluent Society - Essay Example The paper will also review the most important benefits and drawbacks of sub-urbanization and affluence for Americans in the 1950s. The suburban consumers in the 1950s gained much affluence due to the economic prosperity of the US during the period. There was an increase in luxury expenditure and increase in consumer values due to increased enlightening of the suburban population. Prior to the period of 1950s consumer values did not have much dominance in the United States of America. Affluence was not of much meaning before this period. It was during this period that the people of the United States of America gained confidence in the affluence. Material conformity was brought about by mass marketing and consumerism despite that fact that the US market was consisting of people with different characteristics and abilities. Conformity seemed to be the norm in social aspects such as religion and gender roles. The 1950s is commonly referred to as the decade of economic boom. This is a decade that came immediately after the end of the World War II. Therefore, Americans were so eager on spending their money on things that they could not access during the period of war. There wasthe growth of the industries that existed even before the war began. Good examples of such industries are automobiles and steels. There was also growth of new industries such as plastic, electronics, and computers. This is a clear indication that there was an increase in the availability of employment opportunities in the US. There was a resulting increase in workers’ wages and benefits1. This implies that the people of the United States of America were in a better position to spend money on things that were previously termed as luxuries. A research carried out by the Corning Glass company in the 1950s used American women to evaluate the possible performance of their coffee in the market. The research showed just shows the extent to which the specification of customers mattered

Nt Was There Consensus In Post War British Politics Politics Essay

Nt Was There Consensus In Post War British Politics Politics Essay In the context of politics, the term consensus can be defined as a broad agreement exists between parties on important areas of policy  [1]  . Despite first being used as early as the 1950s, the word consensus came to prominence in 1975 when Paul Addison used it to describe the perceived similarities in the goals and policies of the alternating Labour and Conservative governments in the post-war period. The end of World War II was arguably a catalyst for the implementation of ideas  [2]  which had been building for decades prior to the outbreak of war. However, the supposed consensus which existed began to disintegrate in the late 1970s. Commentators, including Brian Harrison, have pinned its demise to 1975 and the appointment of Margaret Thatcher as Conservative party leader due to her struggle (against) those who pursued consensus  [3]  . Crucially, the notion of consensus has not been met with universal acceptance; historians, including Pimlott, have suggested it was a myth, proposing that consensus is a mirage; an illusion that rapidly fades the closer one gets to it  [4]  . In spite of this however, it will be argued that there was indeed agreement between the major parties on fundamental issues. However, the parties often differed in terms of attitude and approach, thus suggesting that consensus is too strong a word to describe this period. Concurring with Hennessy that post-war settlement  [5]  is perhaps a more appropriate description, this essay will take a thematic approach, assessing the degree of consensus in regard to three key areas: economic policy; social policy; and finally foreign and defence policy. Perhaps the most significant area in which to measure the extent of political consensus is through the assessment of economic policy in the post-war period. Public ownership is an area in which, ideologically at least, Labour and the Conservatives should have had divergent views. However, during the late 1940s, coal, gas, electricity, iron and steel were all nationalised and, by the early 1950s, 20 per cent of industry and commerce was state-controlled  [6]  . Crucially, it was a Labour government responsible for the nationalisation statues in the 1940s while the Conservatives remained opposed to such measures, pledging to reverse the statutes and return industry to the private sector. Whilst such plans were never realised, it would be too simplistic to make the assumption that this meant a consensus had been reached. Rather, a convincing case can be made to suggest that a compromise, as opposed to agreement, was reached, with the Conservatives accepting public ownership unwillin gly  [7]  because they sought to avoid causing further disruption. However unwilling the Conservatives may have been, it is clear that, at least until the early 1970s, public ownership remained a point of consensus between the two main parties; the only significant change in this field occurred in 1964 with the renationalisation of iron and steel by Wilsons Labour government. Moreover, strategy towards employment is arguably another key aspect of post-war economic policy which initially points towards a consensus between the two main parties. Following the mass unemployment which characterised the inter-war period, the Second World War virtually eradicated this problem. Understandably, both Labour and the Conservatives sought to maintain this at the end of the war, as outlined in the White Paper on Employment in 1944 which stated that the maintenance of a high and stable level of employment  [8]  would be a key priority for post-war governments. The belief in Keynesianism and commitment to full employment was maintained for three decades, with unemployment averaging less than 3 per cent between 1945 and 1970  [9]  . Whilst at first this appears to be a clear indicator of consensus, a strong case can be made to suggest that both parties were motivated by pragmatism, believing that full employment was good politics  [10]  as it kept morale high and people in work, thus increasing their likelihood of re-election. Furthermore, it is clear that the Conservatives were arguably reluctant partners in the commitment to full employment. Whilst Labour declared its support for introducing measures in the private sector to help achieve full employment, the Conservatives showed a greater degree of reticence. Throughout the 1950s, the Conservatives pledged only to maintain  [11]  present policy, with Kavanagh suggesting this was merely an attempt to live down their reputation as the party of unemployment in the 1930s  [12]  . Subtly, this suggests that the only real source of consensus was in the rhetoric of both parties who both claimed to be advocates of Keynesian economics despite, however, speaking it with different accents and differing emphasis  [13]  . What is more, a third significant aspect of economic policy which, on the surface, suggests a strong degree of consensus in the post-war period concerns trade unions. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, trade unions retained their important role in politics for another thirty years after the Labour defeat in 1951 because, as Peter Dorey asserts, both parties accepted the desirability of working with, rather than against  [14]  trade unions. Demonstrating the extent of the consensus, in the late 1940s, the Conservative party asserted its acceptance of, and commitment to  [15]  trade unionism. A convincing case can be made to suggest that both parties had converging views on trade unions because they appreciated the symbiotic relationship between government and the unions. The avoidance of the 1953 railway strike is a prime example of this; the strike was prevented following close negotiations between the government and National Union of Railwaymen, demonstrating what could be achie ved by close co-operation between the two  [16]  . However, it is important to assess the nature of the perceived consensus. Significantly, trade unions have been described by the likes of the historian Matthias Matthijs as Labours paymasters  [17]  due to the large proportion of party funding they provided. In contrast, the Conservatives were independent from the trade unions and were, thus, more critical of trade unionism, seeking to reform the way in which unions functioned. Therefore, it is clear that, despite sharing the same fundamental belief in the importance of trade unions, both parties had differing attitudes and approaches as a result of their conflicting interests. A further key area, which is essential to discuss in order to assess the extent to which there was a consensus in post-war British politics, is social policy, with particular reference to the National Health Service, welfare, and education. A strong argument can be made to support the assertion that there was indeed a great deal of consensus between the two main parties regarding the welfare state. By the fall of the Labour government in 1951, the foundations were arguably complete but, crucially, if the newly-elected Conservative government had reversed Labours plans, the NHS and welfare state would not have come into existence. The very fact that the Conservatives chose to continue with Labours plans implies a mutual appreciation and acceptance of the key principles  [18]  which underpinned welfare provision. In fact, every government, regardless of party, committed to maintaining and improving  [19]  the welfare state, except for the Heath government between 1970 and 1972. Moreover, following the publication of the Beveridge Report in 1942, it is plausible to suggest that the NHS and welfare state represented more than simply a consensus on policy; instead, the report arguably profoundly influenced both parties and subtly suggests a consensus in their beliefs and principles. This assertion is supported by the likes of Rodney Lowe, who argues that there was now an understanding that government could assume a positive  [20]  role in improving the lives of its citizens. However, despite evidence of a strong, universal commitment to the welfare state between 1945 and 1974, there is evidence of greater divergence between the two parties over time, particularly with regards to the provision of social services and education. Crucially, in the 1960s, elements within the Conservative party began to doubt  [21]  the concept of universal welfare provision, believing instead that selectivity would both reduce welfare spending whilst also targetting those who needed help most. These divisions continued to grow throughout the 1960s and early 1970s as right-wing Conservatives began claim(ing) that high levels of welfare spending were (à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦) undermining the economy  [22]  . Similarly, with regard to education, on the surface at least, this appeared to be a source of consensus; the Education Act of 1944 was conceived by the Conservatives but enacted by Labour, suggesting a common vision for secondary education in Britain. However, as noted by N ick Ellison, there was conflict between the two parties regarding comprehensive and private education. The division on this issue highlights the fundamental ideological differences which existed between Labour and the Conservatives; Labours egalitarian perspective contrasted markedly with Conservative education policy  [23]  . Significantly, this illustrates the limitations of consensus, suggesting that party ideology was not compromised in the name of consensus. Finally, a third broad area which requires discussion in order to determine the extent to which there was a consensus in post-war British politics is foreign and defence policy, with particular reference to Europe, decolonisation and the British Commonwealth. The debate surrounding European integration can be seen, on the surface at least, as evidence of consensus in the post-war period. Throughout the 1950s, both parties remained opposed  [24]  to various ventures, including the formation of the Coal and Steel community in 1950 and, later in 1954, the establishment of a European Defence Community. However, by the 1960s, both parties simultaneously came to accept that joining the European Economic Community was the best way to protect British interests  [25]  . Crucially, the issue of European integration highlights an important feature of the consensus; whilst governments of both parties shared the same views on European integration, this was not necessarily representative o f the opinions of party members, thus stressing the elitist nature of consensus politics and its divorce from party opinion  [26]  . Furthermore, the policy of decolonisation, achieved through the granting of independence to colonies and the subsequent transition to a Commonwealth, marked a clear departure from the policies pursued by Britain prior to the Second World War. Despite the drastic change in direction, both parties appear, in rhetoric at least, to have shared a common vision for the British Empire in the post-war era. This is highlighted in their 1950 election manifestos in which both Labour and the Conservatives outlined their commitment to the Commonwealth and decolonisation. The similarity in the language used is striking; Labour outlined its desire to strengthen  [27]  the association between nations while the Conservatives pledged to and promote and support  [28]  the Commonwealth. On the one hand, this can be perceived as highlighting the true extent to which both parties shared a united vision for post-war foreign policy. However, manifesto rhetoric does not always truly represent the vie ws of the party. Anthony Seldon concurs with this, claiming that Labour was enthusiastic  [29]  while the Conservatives were more reluctant  [30]  about the prospect of decolonisation. However, there are several aspects where there is generally less debate regarding the extent of consensus between the main parties. For instance, both Labour and the Conservatives recognised the value of maintaining a nuclear deterrent and were also of the same view regarding the importance of both Britains membership to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the maintenance of close links with the USA  [31]  . Thus, it is clear that, whilst there were key elements of consensus in post-war foreign and domestic policy, there are also several examples of disagreement. Overall, in assessing economic, social and foreign policy between 1945 and 1974, this essay has highlighted numerous points upon which Labour and the Conservative party have shared a common vision for post-war Britain. However, there are also many examples of disagreement and divergence between the main parties. Fundamentally, it is clear that both parties shared broadly similar goals and policies but differed in terms of their attitude and approach to achieving their shared vision. The key issue is one of semantics, however. Historians have differing definitions of consensus, making it all the more difficult to assess the extent to which there was a consensus in this period. If Addisons definition of consensus as a historically unusual degree of agreement over a wide range of economic and social policies  [32]  is accepted, then it is impossible to deny the strength of consensus in the post-war period. Crucially, as Seldon notes, the use of the word consensus can be unhelpful as it is ambiguous, with some historians referring to a consensus over policy  [33]  while others advocate the existence of a deeper, more profound commitment to a set of common beliefs and values  [34]  . However, despite the ambiguity of the word, the extent to which the two main parties agreed on fundamental issues during this thirty year period was arguably unparalleled. In spite of the disagreements which occurred, there were no major shifts in policy and the existence of a broad consensus, amongst the governing elite at least, is undeniable.

Beloved by Morrison Essay -- Morrison Beloved Book Review

Beloved by Morrison Beloved is the tale of an escaped slave, Sethe, who is trying to achieve true freedom. Unfortunately, though she is no longer in servitude to a master, she is chained to her "hainted" past. Morrison effectively depicts the shattered lives of Sethe, her family, fellow former slaves, and the community through a unique writing style. The narrative does not follow a traditional, linear plot line. The reader discovers the story of Sethe through fragments from the past and present that Morrison reveals and intertwines in a variety of ways. The novel is like a puzzle of many pieces that the reader must put together to form a full picture. Through this style, which serves as a metaphor for the broken lives of her characters, Morrison successfully conveys the horrors of slavery and the power of a community. One of Morrison's techniques is to relate the story of Beloved from several different points of view. Most of the book is told from third-person omniscient, with the viewpoint character constantly changing. For example, in chapter three the perspective switches even during a flashback. At first, the story is told from Sethe's viewpoint. "Down in the grass, like the snake she believed she was, Sethe opened her mouth, and instead of fangs and a split tongue, out shot the truth" (39). Then the narrative changes to the perspective of Amy Denver, who helps Sethe escape when she is pregnant. "The girl moved her eyes slowly, examining the greenery around her. ‘Thought there'd be huckleberries. Look like it. That's why I come up in here. Didn't expect to find no nigger woman'" (39). Every character in the book, dead included, tells part of the story. In chapter sixteen, the point of view switches to... ...nt. He has sex with Beloved and when he reaches the "inside part he was saying, ‘Red heart. Red heart,' over and over again" (138). Morrison weaves together the story of characters whose shared past is so devastating they cannot live in the present. By using a writing style as fragmented and troubled as the lives of her characters, Morrison actively involves the reader in piecing together the horrors of slavery. Beloved at times was difficult to read because of the emotional impact of its passages. The character of Ella best describes the struggle of their lives when she says, "The future was sunset; the past something to leave behind. And if it didn't stay behind, well, you might have to stomp it out. Slave life; freed life-every day was a test and a trial. Nothing could be counted on in a world where even when you were a solution you were a problem" (302).

A drama in play format Essay

Gerald is not a member of the Birling family but he is still caught in their ‘web of sin’. He found Eva in a bar where he was hoping to pick up a mistress; he found her in the clutches of Alderman Megarty. Alderman was harassing Eva. When Gerald, like her knight in shining armour, made Alderman go away, they started to talk and became friends and eventually lovers. This all happened during the time that Sheila and Gerald were lovers. This is the largest part of the immoral act committed by Gerald, which was in fact not against Eva but against Shelia. Eventually he decided that their relationship had to end so he gave her some money and they went their separate ways. It is my belief that for a time Gerald and Eva were in love, as when it sinks in that she is dead he says, page 35: ‘Sorry – I – well, I’ve suddenly realised – taken it in properly – that she’s dead. ‘ Gerald was the only member of the group to show some love and compassion to Eva. Later, Gerald appears to be indifferent to the death of Eva especially after the inspector has left and he believes it was all a hoax. Indifference is also shown to the fact that he sinned. Mrs Birling denied Eva benefits from a charity of which she was the chairman. This was for several reasons, but the main one was the fact that Eva fabricated a name when it was her turn to be interviewed by the charity’s committee. Her name of choice was Mrs Birling, this was because it was Eric who had made her pregnant, and the real Mrs Birling obviously did not know this fact, and seemed to think that Eva was personally insulting her. Eva therefore received no benefits. This was a highly immoral act, as the members of the committee are not meant to be prejudiced towards any appeal. Mrs Birling thought that what she did was acceptable because Eva had lied. However, it was in fact not a lie as it was Eric’s child, also a Mr Birling, and he did propose to marry her but she had refused, as she knew it would not work. Eric was in a bar one night and he got talking to Eva, he also got drunk. He then walked Eva home and forced himself upon her, page 52: ‘Well, I was in that state when a chap easily turns nasty’. After she told him she was pregnant he began to steal money from his father’s business to help her. This was the only unintentional act of cruelty to happen to Eva, as all the others were purposeful acts of cruelty. He was not cruel to her but still he brought her suffering. He was another member of the group actually affected by the events. As he seems to have been changed for the better by the death of Eva. The Inspector’s name is Goole. Pronounced the same as the ghost, or ghoul. This makes me think that he is a ghost or a spectre of some kind, sent to the Birling family to show them the errors of their ways. A lot like the ghosts of Christmas Past, Present and Future from Charles Dickens’ ‘A Christmas Carol’. He appears to know about Eva’s death before it has even happened: perhaps he has some kind of sixth sense. He says towards the end of the third act, page 54: ‘And my trouble is – that I haven’t much time. ‘ Is this because he knows the real police will soon call the house to ask their questions? We know in retrospect that at this point there is no dead body at the mortuary, because Gerald Croft rings the mortuary to ascertain this soon after Goole has left. I do not believe that Inspector Goole is a real police inspector. His mannerisms are unlike those of a real police officer, although he does refuse a drink at the beginning, page 11: ‘No thank you, Mr Birling. I’m on duty. ‘ I think he says this because he is acting the role of a policeman. He becomes too emotionally involved in the situation; a real policeman would keep the questioning on an official level. For example, he says to Mr Birling, page 46: ‘Don’t stammer and yammer at me again, man. I’m losing all patience with you people. ‘ This story is told as a drama in play format. The end of each of the three acts, including the final one, is completed with a moment of suspense. The audience is left anticipating the next act, wondering what will happen. The audience also become emotionally attached to the characters and want to know whether Sheila and Gerald will remain engaged, they want to know what the Birlings will do with Eric, and will there be a public scandal? They are drawn in to the rights and wrongs of the characters’ actions, and they pass judgement upon Gerald and Eric’s behaviour, Mrs Birling’s snobbery, Mr Birling’s self righteousness. The audience listens to the moral of the story, that we are individuals in a society, who should look after each other, and not be merely out for what we can get. The final few words of the play are unexpected. We have had the feeling that the Inspector is not all he seems, but now that the real police (presumably) have telephoned, things become clearer. I wanted to see a continuation of the play, with real events, real police, and see how much the characters changed when faced with the information again. No doubt Sheila and Eric would approach the situation differently, they seem to have learned a lesson from events. On page 70, Sheila says: ‘ Everything we said had happened really had happened. If it didn’t end tragically, then that’s lucky for us. But it might have done. ‘ and on page 71: ‘You’re pretending everything’s just as it was before’. She and Eric have moved on from their original viewpoints, and this gives us hope for the future, it is to be hoped that they would not behave so badly again in their future relationships with people. Unfortunately, we are unable to know the real ending.

Modern World: Things Fall Apart

â€Å" We cannot leave the matter in his hands because he doesn’t not understand our customs, just as we do not understand his. We say he is foolish because he does not know our ways, and perhaps he says we are foolish because we do not know his. Let him go away† (*1). This quote shows the major theme of the book which is change vs tradition. The quote shows the theme perfectly; basically it shows the ignorance of most of the Umuofia clan and their fear of the white peoples culture taking over theirs. They are dealing with the question of whether change should be privileged over tradition.The people of Umuofia want a little change but at the same time they have fear of completely losing their way of life, the people are divided on the subject at hand at what the right and wrong thing to do is, and how much is to much change. When the first white men was seen there was controversy already. The man was seen in Abame, the elders immediately went to see their oracle out of fear. The oracle told the elders that â€Å" the strange man would break their clan and spread destruction among them† (*2). So the people killed the white men immediately out of fear.Then a few weeks later out of revenge three white men went to the Abame market and shot everyone except the people that weren't there. The Abame people were foolish they should have known â€Å" Never kill a man who says nothing† ( * 3). But regardless of why the shooting happened at the Abame market the gossip had started and the fear had set in for the white men. After the Abame incident, other white people began to show. The white missionaries went to Umuofia and had begun building churches there and began getting converts.Not everyone was fond of the new religion though, but the leaders of the clan were not scarred because they believed that the weird faith would not last. Missionaries also arrived in the village of Mbanta. The missionaries begun telling the people of the villages abo ut the new religion â€Å" We have been sent by this great God to ask you to leave your wicked ways and false gods and turn to Him so that you may be saved when you die† (*4). The missionaries started to have the people of the villages question their religion and culture, and to make them think am I just worshiping false gods of wood and stone?Is all the rituals and killing and destroying innocent children actually right? Many questions began to stir. One person in particular who was captivated by the new religion was Nwoye, Okonkwo’s son. Nwoye became one of the first converts, but because of this change with his life that meant that he was no longer part of Okonkwo’s life or ever be considered his son. Even though this hurt Nwoye, he felt a relief in his life, so he thought that he could find other people within his new religion that would love him more then his father ever had.As the missionaries kept on spreading the word of their new religion and changing p eoples life’s, they decided to ask for some land to build their church. So the clan decided to give them as much land somewhere as they wanted. The missionaries were very happy that they were getting the land, but what they didn’t know was the land they were getting was called the â€Å"evil forest† because it was alive with sinister forces and was evil. The â€Å" evil forest† was where the clan had buried everyone that died from evil diseases.There was a so called curse that was set on the forest, so the people of Mbanta expected the missionaries to all be dead within four days. Not knowing of the curse the missionaries begun immediately clearing out the forest and building their church, and as each day went by and no one was dying the people of Mbanta were questioned about why the curse wasn't working on the white men. The church in Mbanta kept getting stronger and stronger as each day passed and was getting more converts. Okonkwo remained angered at t he new changes in Mbanto, â€Å" until the abominable gang was chased out of the village with whips there would be no peace† (*5).Although some did not mind the changes â€Å" It is not our custom to fight for our gods, let us not presume to do so now† (*6). Although everyone had their own opinions of the matter at hand, the assembly out of fear decided to exclude the christians from the privileges and life of the clan. Even though the new faith had only a few converts at first, the christians quickly grew and had became a small community and they were not going to be easily shut down. After the seven years of Okonkwo living in Mbanta, he was finally able to go back to Umuofia after being exiled.Although things had been changing in Mbanta, Okonkwo was unaware that Umuofia had also been changing. He still expected to just go back and have everything still be the same, even though that was the total opposite. The new church was not the only thing that had changed since h e was gone in Umuofia; the white men also brought a new government to the village. The men of power were no longer the high titled men, chief priests, and the elders, the men of power were now the District of Commissioner, and the court messengers.The District Commissioner had become the head of the government in Umuofia who judged cases ignorantly, then there were the court messengers who guarded the new prison, which was filled with citizens who would not listen to the white man’s laws. Okonkwo was very confused about what has happened to the village he once had some power over. â€Å" What is it that has happened to our people? Why have they lost the power to fight (*7)? † Okonkwo was so flabbergasted about how his once perfectly traditional south african village had changed into a government controlled christian village.So many things were changing, not only did the white men bring a new religion, and a new government, but they also brought trading to the village, which helped the village have more of a money flow and schools were beginning to be built. The clan had become barely recognizable to Okonkwo anymore, it was falling apart in his eyes. The village had not only begun to fall apart in Okonkwo’s eyes but in others soon to follow too. On the annual worship of the earth goddess day, one of the egwugwu’s masks were accidentally torn off by Enoch, which was one of the greatest crimes a man could commit.Enoch showed everyone that that the egwugwu’s were merely men impersonating spirits, therefore Enoch had basically killed an ancestral spirit. From Enoch doing that he helped the missionaries falsify the Umuofia's religion and show that it was all superstition, but he also re-sparked the conflict between the christian church and the clan. That was the last straw for the clan with dealing with the christians, â€Å" Tell him to go back to his house and leave us alone†¦ But this shrine which he built must be destroye d. We shall no longer allow it in our midst† (*8).The clan came in agreement to burns down the church; which makes Okonkwo very happy for once. The men in Umuofia finally begun to take back the village that was once theirs, so the next few days the men were armed and stayed aware. As the men were on cloud nine thinking things might end up going back to the traditional ways, they forgot to remember that their was still a government. The district commissioner was at a tour when the clan decided to burn down the church and not follow the laws. But when the District Commissioner did come back from his tour, Mr.Smith, who was the head missionary ,immediately caught the Commissioner up on what had happened while he was away. After finding out what had happened the Commissioner got his messenger to round up the leaders of Umuofia for a meeting. When all six leaders, including Okonkwo, met up at the commissioners headquarters they were asked what had happened, before they even had a c hance to explain what had happened then they were immediately arrested. â€Å" I have brought you here because you joined together to molest others, to burn people’s houses and their place of worship† (*8).The six leaders were fined with two hundred bags of cowries and were sentenced to prison and would not be released until they paid the fine, and if they choose not to they would be taken to Umuru to be hung. Thankfully each one of the leaders paid the fine, and were set free. Okonkwo was so incredible angered when he was let out of the prison. Later that night when he went back to his hut he could barley even sleep. All he could think about was revenge, and how no matter what he was not going to back out of his plan.The next morning he went to the meeting place, which was the marketplace where he was going to meet Obierika. â€Å" All our gods are weeping. Idemili is weeping, Ogwugwu is weeping, Agbala is weeping, and all the others. Our dead fathers are weeping bec ause of the shameful sacrilege they are suffering and the abomination we have all seen with our eyes† (*9). Okonkwo decided that enough was enough he was not going to stand by and watch his clan fall apart any longer. â€Å" We must root out this evil. And if our brothers take the side of evil we must root them out too.And we must do it now. We must bale this water now that it is only ankle deep†¦ † (*10). And that is exactly what Okonkwo did. He stood by his word, and he did what he felt was right. He shot and killed a messenger at the market place, where every person witnessed with their own eyes. Shortly after this the District Commissioner arrived at Okonkwo’s compound to retrieve him to be killed because of the sin he had just committed, but the commissioner along with a few other people had realized he was to late the deed had been already done.Okonkwo was found hanging dead on a tree behind his compound; he committed suicide. When Okonkwo was found de ad Obierika turned to the District Commissioner and said, â€Å" That man was one of the greatest men in Umuofia. You drove him to kill himself; and now he will be buried like a dog† (*11). So rather then wait to be killed and humiliated, Okonkwo took matters into his own hands and killed himself. In the book Things fall apart the main character Okonkwo ended up both losing and winning at the end.He lost in the sense of the new religion, and government, and basically just the overall change ended up winning over tradition. Which was what he feared all along. But in a sense he won because the last thing he did before he died was something he completely believed was the right thing to do, so he never gave up or stopped trying, even though he knows that he did all that he could and tried. But In the end it was just unbearable for him to live any longer with all that had changed in his village, so he did what he wanted to do, which was killing the messenger, then he killed himsel f.He killed himself because he understood that since he killed the messenger he was then going to be killed for the sin he had committed. But he he didn't want to be killed by someone else and be made as an example, and he didn’t want to give the satisfaction to the District Of Commissioner by letting himself get killed by him. So in the end he just gave up and realized their was nothing else he could do about the situation at hand. â€Å"The world has no end, and what is good among one people is an abomination with others† (* 11).That shows that no matter that people will always see things differently, what is good or bad or what is right or what is wrong. No matter what, the world will never be agreeing on the matter at hand, there will always be fighting and arguing as long as their is something to be argued about. So in the end through all the fighting and heartache Okonkwo’s death symbolized the tradition dyeing out and change taking over.

buy custom Fascinating Argumentative Essay Sample on Types of English Speakers

buy custom Fascinating Argumentative Essay Sample on Types of English Speakers Argumentative Essay Sample on Types of English Speakers Abstract The linguistic classification of English speakers from the Outer Circle nations, such as Singapore, Malaysia and India, is usually vague, since the types of English they speak are considered by many individuals as different from inter-languages; however, they are not considered as English native varieties. This research paper will make an argument about sending the UAE students to study in the Outer Circle countries. It will concentrate on why high school graduates from the UAE should or should not be offered scholarships in the Outer Circle countries. This is because the type of English that is being taught in the Outer Circle countries is not the same to what the students are being taught in the UAE schools. Besides, there should be the establishment of a policy, which will regulate the criteria of sending students to the Outer Circle countries. This paper will consist of the following sections: introduction, background, the UAE community attitude, analysis of the findings of the i nterview and conclusions.

Essay 2 - see attachment for topic and readings

2 - see attachment for topic and readings - Essay Example This view divides cities by class into areas occupied by those who control the means of production i.e. the bourgeoisie as well as the proletariat who works for a living. The Marxist view of the development of cities certainly takes class very seriously as there are rich neighborhoods and poor areas which are demarcated quite strongly by the developments taking place in a city. With time, the changes in the development of the city took factories out of the city centers and moved them to the outer edges of the city limits. Gary, Indiana is used as an example of that occurrence and the cause given for this change is that the factory owners wanted to avoid the presence of unions on their factory floors. Unions were difficult to form and maintain outside the city limits therefore unions could be avoided in this manner and control over the workers could be maintained with a capitalist agenda (Gordon, 1978). The same ideas are supported by Harris & Lewis (2001) but they given other economic reasons for the changes in the cityscapes of North America. They suggest that polynucleation was the reason for these changes and this was caused by the diversification of population and the lack of availability of workers of one type or another in a given location. Low prices for land as well as labor also helped the cause of those manufacturers that were ready to offset the cost of moving their production units by gaining access to cheaper tools for producing their goods. Thus the reasons for the development of our cities as they have are not based on social theory, but rather an economic agenda. Perhaps the most important point made in the both the essays is the idea that technology will affect the development of cities in the future as it has done so in the past. For example, the advent of the automobile meant that people could easily cover a lot of distance on their own without the use of trains or other transport and that meant that they

Business Decision Making Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words - 2

Business Decision Making - Assignment Example In order to study the topic, a research is conducted on the coffee market of London to analyze the emerging market trends. This would help in presenting a report to the senior management for the introduction of a new coffee-based drink for coffee shop customers. As the product development coordinator of the coffee packaging company it is important that I should conduct primary research. This would help in determining the consumer profile, their preferences, attitudes and buying behaviors related to coffee. This information would be collected through survey questionnaires. The survey would be conducted on a random sample and not systemic one. Random sampling will allow the marketer to thoroughly analyze the consumer preference and behavior as everyone will have an equal chance of being selected (Winston, Stevens, Sherwood, & Dunn, 2013). On the contrary, random sampling might also generates some errors such as the sample might not be best suitable for the product, etc. Moreover there is no control in random sampling technique. It should be noted that all the data for the consumer profile, preference and buying behavior will be gathered with the help of primary research i.e. through survey questionnaires. After gathering the primary data and analyzing the consumer preferences etc. the data related to market will be collected and analyzed through secondary research. In the secondary research the data will be gathered with the help of studying market reports related to coffee drinks (Giovannucci & Koekoek, 2003). Furthermore, the secondary research will also identify and analyze some basic elements of coffee industry such as market competitiveness, which are the main competitors, what the market structure is, and how the shares of the coffee market are divided into the key players. All this will be studied with the help